The Appraisal of Agriculture and Literature in the Proem to the De coniuratione Catilinae

Main Article Content

Darío Néstor Sánchez Vendramini

Abstract

This article re-examines the appraisal of agriculture and literature in the proem to Sallust’s De coniuratione Catilinae (Sall., Cat., 1–4) and argues that the passage in which the historian dismisses farming and hunting—presented as servile tasks—must be read within the proem’s argumentative architecture, which subordinates aristocratic pursuits to the aim of glory. On the basis of a joint analysis of the proems to Sallust’s two historical monographs, the article shows that the author’s purpose is to legitimise historiography as an alternative path to glory in a post-Caesarian context in which the political arena ceases to be a propitious field for attaining it. It further contends that this reorientation shifts the centre of glory from negotium to the arts of the mind proper to otium. In this framework, the reduced esteem accorded to agriculture and hunting is coherent: not because of their intrinsic nature, but because they do not contribute—within Sallust’s programme—to the pursuit of glory that only virtus animi and historiography can secure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Becker, C. (1973). Sallust. En H. Temporini (Ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW) I.3: Sprache und Literatur (1. Jahrhundert v. Chr.) (pp. 720–754). de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110836424-020

Büchner, K. (1982). Sallust (2ª ed.). Winter.

Burkard, Th. (2004). Forschung aktuell: Sallust. Ein Forschungsbericht. Pegasus-Onlinezeitschrift, IV(1), 1–25.

Delz, J. (1985). Verachtete Sallust die Beschäftigung mit der Landwirtschaft? Museum Helveticum, (42), 168–173.

Doblhofer, E. (1992). Horaz in der Forschung nach 1957. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Earl, D. C. (1961). The political thought of Sallust. Cambridge University Press.

Earl, D. C. (1965). Review of Sallust by Ronald Syme. Journal of Roman Studies, 55, 234–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/297442

Egermann, F. (1932). Die Prooemien zu den Werken des Sallust. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.

Feeney, D. (2021). Beginning Sallust’s Catiline. En Explorations in Latin Literature, Vol. I (pp. 141–147). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680226.009

Galinsky, K. (1996). Augustan culture. Princeton University Press.

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1982). Sallust. En E. J. Kenney & W. V. Clausen (Eds.), The Cambridge history of classical literature. Vol. II: Latin literature (pp. 268–280). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210430.013

Heldmann, K. (1993). Sallust über die römische Weltherrschaft. Franz Steiner. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110950496

Koestermann, E. (1971). C. Sallustius Crispus. Bellum Iugurthinum. Winter.

Kraus, C. S., & Woodman, A. J. (1997). The Latin historians (Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 27). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0533245100030212

Krebs, C. B. (2008). The imagery of “the way” in the proem to Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae (1–4). American Journal of Philology, 129(4), 581–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.0.0030

La Penna, A. (1981). Die Bedeutung der Proömien Sallusts. En V. Pöschl (Ed.), Sallust. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Leeman, A. D. (1954). Sallusts Prologe und seine Auffassung von der Historiographie. Mnemosyne, 7, 323–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852554X00324

Leeman, A. D. (1955). Sallusts Prologe und seine Auffassung von der Historiographie (Conclusión). Mnemosyne, 8, 38–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852555X00080

Leeman, A. D. (1965). A systematical bibliography of Sallust (2ª ed.). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004327016

Mellor, R. (2002). Foreword. En R. Syme, Sallust (2ª ed., pp. xxxiv–xliv). University of California Press.

Morgan, L. (2000). The autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio. Journal of Roman Studies, 90, 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/300200

Neumeister, C. (1986). Neue Tendenzen und Ergebnisse der Sallust-Forschung (1961–1981). Gymnasium, 93, 51–68.

Nisbet, R. G. M., & Rudd, N. (2004). A commentary on Horace: Odes, Book III. Oxford University Press.

Ramsey, J. T. (2007). Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Edited, with introduction and commentary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press (for the American Philological Association).

Reynolds, L. D. (Ed.). (1991). C. Sallusti Crispi: Catilina; Iugurtha; Historiarum fragmenta selecta. Appendix Sallustiana (Oxford Classical Texts). Clarendon Press.

Ring, A. (2011). Sallust. Oxford Bibliographies Online—Classics. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0110.xml DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0110

Sánchez Vendramini, D. (2010). Eliten und Kultur. Eine Geschichte der Römischen Literaturszene (240 v.Chr. - 117 n. Chr.). Rudolf Habelt.

Schmal, S. (2001). Sallust. Olms.

Suerbaum, W. (1968). Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter (Spudasmata 19). Olms.

Syme, R. (2002). Sallust (2ª ed.). University of California Press.

Vogt, J. (1938). Cicero und Sallust über die Catilinarische Verschwörung. Mohr (Siebeck).

Vretska, A. (1976). C. Sallustius Crispus. De Catilinae coniuratione. Winter.